Leave.EU fake exposed. But does anyone even care?

Alleged propaganda bullhorn, leave dot EU, were not afraid to provoke and galvanise outrage.

Often at the supposed “fake news” media, who were apparently “hiding the truth” from voters.

But even a cursory examination of some of their most provocative videos show that it was in fact leave. eu that was creating misleading videos, while railing against the fabricated “worrying scenes neglected by the British media”.

Take this campaign video, from 4 weeks before the referendum in 2016.

The title ominously told voters:

“Worrying Scenes in Europe neglected by the British Media”

The video went viral. It was viewed 1.4 million times on Facebook.

The campaign video was an edited collection of various riots and protests, spliced together with simple headlines like “Athens anti Austerity riots” and “French labour law riots“.

Along with more provocative headlines like: “French Muslim riots” and the most provocative of all

“Migrants drag women into subway in Germany”

The context of the whole video is obviously disingenuous. Lumping together protests in Athens, Paris and a crime in Cologne as a reason to “vote leave”.

Which is of course absurd. An obvious piece of insane propaganda designed to make people feel unsafe and scared, when in fact they are perfectly safe.

Anti Austerity riots in Greece by pensioners in 2015 and 2016 are not a danger to people living in the UK, clearly. Nor are “French labour riots” anything new, or a danger to anyone in the UK, or even in France really.

But one suspects that those elements of the video were just filler. The entire point of the video being to make sure people saw the “rape” in the “German subway”, as it is the most impactful and distressing part.

Based on the comments on Facebook from the time, it had the most impact with viewers and caused the most outrage, too.

How we know Leave. EU’s video was a scaremongering, calculated, Fake:

  1. Firstly, the alleged propagandists at Leave. eu appear to have ripped the video from Liveleak.But as they did so, they reduced the quality of the video.They posted a more pixellated version than the original. Reducing the quality of the video meant that the posters, sign and graffiti, seen on the walls, were harder to make out and read clearly.As they were mostly in Arabic, not German, leave .eu would presumably wanted to have blurred these to conceal the fact that it was not in Germany at all.The original video is available online, for example posted by Daily News Egypt.It’s listed as happening in Tahrir Square in Cairo on June 30th 2013:
  2. Secondly, the people at Leave. eu, or perhaps someone who ripped the video previously, edited the video so that the Arabic “No Smoking Sign” was not visible at the top of the screen.They cropped the top of the video so it was hidden.You can see the sign, in Arabic, in the Daily News Egypt version, as well as the other Egyptian versions available online. Because of course signs in “Germany” don’t tend to be in Arabic and English.


    Leave. eu cropped version, missing most of the Arabic portion of the sign:

Debunked. But do people even care, if it plays to their fears?

Unfortunately, the fact that the video is a complete fake, as well as the truth that the “British media” aren’t covering this up at all, didn’t seem to matter to many who were already on board with the general message.

Even though it was in fact leave.eu who were deceiving these people, quite outrageously. While projecting their own deceptive behaviour onto “The media” and pretending to be exposing a conspiracy.

None of this seems to have mattered.

There were a few commenters at the time who calmly debunked the video. Pointing out that it was in Cairo, not Germany.

But the responses were all the same. They didn’t care.

Some examples below:

“Doesn’t matter, they’re still animals”

“Does it matter what country?”

“This may not have happened in Germany. But it doesn’t matter, similar stuff occurred”

“Are you saying that nothing happened? I don’t believe that”

One man, who clearly supported Brexit, actually realised that he was being duped.

But instead of being annoyed, or even concerned at the motives of the deception, he commented praise for Leave.EU. Thanked them for their campaign.

His main concern was that the “scum” of the remain campaign might be able to make political hay out of it.

Plenty of other commenters on the campaign video felt angry that the BBC was hiding something from them and were glad Russia Today/RT could help them see the “truth”.

This video was viewed more than 1,000,000 times before the referendum. If it was on TV, would we accept it? If it was in print, would we?

Just because it’s on Facebook, or the internet, it seems like no one cares and there is no penalty.


  1. LatetotheParty

    You’re 100% of the way there.

    This was originally created about the German Christmas riots ripping the Egyptian square incident as a stand alone psyop and was released immediately after the event. That release was professional, had a wide spread on multiple media sites and a more generalized target group.

    Leave.Eu didn’t create the original, but amazing journalism here, thanks for taking the time to post this. We owe you!

    You’re like a junior Bellingcat, they’re amazing though, really professional. Hint: their latest “how US person was radicalized” is 100% interesting, a must read.

    1. Post
  2. Jim Kent

    I’m really appalled by the way many Leavers seem to think – or rather don’t think. EU has protected us from several Tory inspired disasters like the Snoopers Charter and offered many trading advantages. WTO rules will open the door to more exploitation like Virgin suing NHS for £82M for not getting child health contract. More will follow

  3. Peter Lihou

    This article shows just how sick the Leave campaigners can be and how low they will sink to undermine our democracy.

  4. Outraged

    HOW is this legal?

    1.5 million people watched this… If it had been on TV, the producers would be in jail!

    Yet for some reason, we let liars and neo nazis push this content and lies to peoples eyeballs (millions!) and nothing is done.

    Social media is destroying the fabric of society and Europe should regulate it. China knew the dangers and did so, so did Russia, a long, long time ago.

    They are oppressive and brutal, but they knew how dangerous it is for society. We regulate TV and print in free society, why do American tech giants get a free pass to destroy our social fabric and spread anger destroying civil society?

  5. Samuel Knopf

    You are missing the main point: it indeed doesn’t matter that much if the video was fake or not, as there were enough other reports of refugees in Germany misbehaving.

    The point is, Brexit will not change a thing about refugees. EU free movement does not apply to refugees, only to EU citizens. It’s incredible but at least 2 / 3 of Leave voters believe that EU free movement of people applies to citizens of Morocco, Iraq and Somalia. There should be a massive campaign debunking this myth once and for all. That would eliminate at least a third of Leave support.

    1. Post

      I don’t think this misses the point at all. It is a complete fabrication and a manipulative lie, intended to make people very angry.

      If you think that faking a video of Egypt and labelling it as Germany, with the title “This is what the Media isn’t telling you”, to generate anger and fury at the EU, then I don’t know what to say.

      Truth and facts do matter, lying and creating fake propaganda is not acceptable, if you accept this – then you will accept them lying about anything and say its not the point.

  6. Pingback: How Farage's Campaign Colluded with Putin to Weaponise Hate and Islamophobia – Byline Times

  7. Pingback: UKIP are still posting fake and doctored videos to create anger at dark skinned people – BrexitBalls

  8. Pingback: The Brexit Endgame – Big Headers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.